India: RBI on hold, cautious guidance for the near-term

The Reserve Bank of India monetary policy committee (MPC) left the benchmark repo rate unchanged at 4% along our expectations.
Radhika Rao06 Aug 2020
  • The monetary policy committee left the repo rate unchanged at 4%
  • For the financial sector, a debt recast window will be introduced
  • An expert committee will arrive at the nuances
  • Real rates have slipped into red
Photo credit: AFP Photo

Temporary pause

The Reserve Bank of India monetary policy committee (MPC) left the benchmark repo rate unchanged at 4% along our expectations (India: RBI preview and financial sector health). The policy corridor was also preserved, with the reverse repo rate at 3.35% and Marginal Standing Facility (MSF) rate at 4.25%. Policy was maintained with an accommodative stance.

Markets had pared rate cut expectations prior to the policy decision (see chart), with the spread highlighting expectations that the rate cutting cycle is nearing the last leg.

Economic assessment: The MPC reiterated its cautious stance on the back of re-imposition of lockdowns in pandemic affected cities and states but drew confidence from high-frequency data signalling that the worse of the slump in economic activity is behind us. The RBI refrained from providing a growth projection, whilst repeating that growth in FY21 is expected to stay negative.

The view on inflation was that short-term pressures would keep the headline above target, but ease back into range towards end-year. Food inflation was expected to stay elevated due to supply chain disruptions on account of COVID-19 (vegetables and protein-based) but turn favourable when the rabi crop supplies dampen cereal prices in midst of higher open market sales and higher procurement helps expand public distribution offtake.  Non-food pressures are seen as sticky due to higher fuel taxes, imparting cost push pressures going forward, (we add) high gold prices feeding through personal care segment. For guidance, headline inflation is seen as elevated in 3Q20 but ease in 4Q20-1Q21 (2HFY21).

Guidance: While the overall assessment was accommodative, in the near-term the MPC will stay guarded, which is also backed by the three-month households’ inflationary expectations > one-year gauge. Inflation is expected to ease towards 4Q20 as COVID-19 related impact fades and favourable base effects resurface, which might provide a window to resume easing, if economic activity remains subdued. We maintain our expectation for another 50bps this year, marking the bottom of the rate cutting cycle.

On transmission, there are some encouraging signs: a) spreads of 3-year AAA-rated corporate bonds vs 3Y GSecs narrowed from 276bps between March 2020 vs July 2020, with similar compression in AA+, AA and lowest investment grades also seen; b) for NBFCs, AA+ 3Y NBFC bonds vs GSecs are down from 360bps to 139bps around the same timeline; c) weighted average lending rate on fresh rupee loans sanctioned by banks fell by 162bps during February 2019-June 2020, of which more than half has happened between March to June 2020.

Financial and development announcements

Details on the financial and developmental announcements can be viewed here and here.

The most-watched aspect was the decision was for financial sector players, who had been provided with a loan moratorium which ends in late-August. To allow affected borrowers some breathing room, a one-time debt recast window has been introduced (on the basis of the June 2019 circular on stressed assets). An expert committee is likely to arrive at the nuances (financial parameters, tenor eligibility etc.), which will include corporates, personal loans and smaller businesses. Few features included – i) to qualify, the borrower accounts would have to be standard as of March 2020, with this status likely to be maintained till the date of the invocation; ii) few provisioning requirements will also need to be adhered to, e.g. lenders shall have to keep additional provisions of 10% on the post-resolution debt; iii) lenders may allow extension of the residual tenor of the loan, with or without payment moratorium, by a period not more than two years.

Returning to a phase of negative real rates

After a prolonged phase of positive rates since 2014, real rates returned to negative territory – inflation vs repo rate, deposits as well as 1Y T-bond yield.

Past linkages between positive real rates and savings behaviour is, however, being tested in the current cycle.

Firstly, Following the 115bps repo cuts and 155bps reduction in the reverse repo rate since the start of the year, part of the transmission has been led by a cut in the bank deposit rates (paving the way for lending rate cuts). Saving rates have fallen, but demand and time deposit growth has accelerated to 12% y/y and 10.6% respectively in May-June. A good part of this can be classified as driven by higher precautionary savings in midst of the pandemic, also implying potential deferment in consumption and spending in midst of an uncertain economic environment. 

Secondly, back in 2018-2019, despite a wide 300-400bp buffer, there was no material pick-up in the banks’ deposits, lagging credit growth and raising concerns over a structural liquidity gap. India’s overall savings rate, led by households, has also been on the decline in recent years, even after the real rates recovered from a sharp deficit before 2013. This has raised questions over the role of interest rates, in isolation, as a driver of savings behaviour.

A study by RBI staff [1], interestingly, highlighted that deposit growth holds a closer relationship with nominal GDP trends rather than deposit interest rates. It was established that income levels were the most powerful in driving deposit growth in the short-and long-term, while rates mattered only at the margin (low coefficients). If this view holds water, then the justification that real rates needs to be high to boost deposit growth, weakens, implying policy rates have room to be lowered, especially as the economy is in midst of a cyclical slowdown and calls to lower cost of financing remains strong.

In this regard, the RBI’s recent report on household finances [1] highlighted the onset of deleveraging pre-dating COVID-19. Household gross financial assets ticked down from 11.1% of GDP to 10.6% of GDP in FY20, just as net financial assets rose to 7.7% (+0.5%), with the resultant 1% of GDP drop in financial liabilities signaling a cutback in borrowings. This occurred despite easing credit costs due to a dovish policy bent (-135bps cut). This deleveraging bout was likely driven by higher income uncertainty as well as weaker sentiments even prior to the pandemic hit, partly responsible for stark slowdown in private consumption in the past year.

Typically, a temporary income shock leads household to borrow to maintain consumption, however expectations of a protracted uncertainty trends to spur cutback in liabilities and increase in savings (cash and deposits). This trend - weaker appetite for leverage and increase in precautionary savings likely accelerated in FY21 given the pandemic-driven shock to confidence, incomes and employment prospects.

Notes: [1] Bank Deposits: Underlying Dynamics (Behera, Raut, Sinha 2019)

To read the full report, click here to Download the PDF.

Subscribe here to receive our economics & macro strategy materials.
To unsubscribe, please click here.

Radhika Rao

Economist – India, Thailand & Eurozone

The information herein is published by DBS Bank Ltd and PT Bank DBS Indonesia (collectively, the “DBS Group”). It is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Group does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy, completeness, timeliness or correctness for any particular purpose. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Any recommendation contained herein does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation & the particular needs of any specific addressee. The information herein is published for the information of addressees only & is not to be taken in substitution for the exercise of judgement by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. The Group, or any of its related companies or any individuals connected with the group accepts no liability for any direct, special, indirect, consequential, incidental damages or any other loss or damages of any kind arising from any use of the information herein (including any error, omission or misstatement herein, negligent or otherwise) or further communication thereof, even if the Group or any other person has been advised of the possibility thereof. The information herein is not to be construed as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities, futures, options or other financial instruments or to provide any investment advice or services. The Group & its associates, their directors, officers and/or employees may have positions or other interests in, & may effect transactions in securities mentioned herein & may also perform or seek to perform broking, investment banking & other banking or finan­cial services for these companies. The information herein is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Sources for all charts & tables are CEIC & Bloomberg unless otherwise specified.

DBS Bank Ltd., 12 Marina Blvd, Marina Bay Financial Center Tower 3, Singapore 018982. Tel: 65-6878-8888. Company Registration No. 196800306E. DBS Bank Ltd., Hong Kong Branch, a company incorporated in Singapore with limited liability. 18th Floor, The Center, 99 Queen’s Road Central, Central, Hong Kong.

PT Bank DBS Indonesia, DBS Bank Tower, 33rd floor, Ciputra World 1, Jalan Prof. Dr. Satrio Kav 3-5, Jakarta, 12940, Indonesia. Tel: 62-21-2988-4000. Company Registration No.